Home Statement Drafts History Resources

CCCC 1997: Outcomes Forum (Session L.17)

Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis Goals for Writing Courses (April 3, 1995; re-keyed by site administrator)

100 Level
  • rhetorical context: recognize basic elements of rhetorical context - persona, purpose, audience
  • collaboration: practice basic social and cognitive tools for collaboration
  • writing processes: recognize and use basic terminology of the writing process; recognize and manipulate own writing process
  • argument: practice use of experience, observation, and other texts as evidence
  • analysis, synthesis, evaluation: analyze, synthesize, and evaluate reader responses, assignments, personal experiences, and texts
  • research: evaluate and use sources of support; use basic research strategies and MLA citation
  • style, conventions, language awareness: correct major surface errors; recognize basic conventions and styles; recognize and manipulate own style; appreciate variety
  • genres: recognize and use basic academic genres
200 Level
  • rhetorical context: develop and practice strategies for writing in varied rhetorical contexts
  • collaboration: increase number of collaborative tools; select tools to fit rhetorical context
  • writing processes: sustain longer, more complex revision; practice greater control of structure
  • argument: practice argument from experience, with increasing emphasis on observation- and text-based argument
  • analysis, synthesis, evaluation: analyze, synthesize, and evaluate feaature of one's own and other writers' texts; interpret and personalize assignments
  • research: use research strategies for specialized assignments
  • style, conventions, language awareness: increase appreciation of styles; expand stylistic repertoire; understand conventions of specific discourse communities
  • genres: expand repertoire of academic and workplace genres
300- and 400-Level
  • rhetorical context: expand repertoire of strategies for writing in varied rhetorical contexts
  • collaboration: direct one's own collaboration; develop one's own collaborative tools
  • writing processes: examine reading and writing processes in relation to each other
  • argument: practice argument integrating personal and public voices, within more complex rhetorical contexts
  • analysis, synthesis, evaluation: analyze increasingly diverse rhetorical contexts, including factors such as culture and ideology
  • research: refine research strategies for specialized purposes
  • style, conventions, language awareness: recognize relativity of conventions; increase awareness of language varieties
  • genres: master increasingly diverse academic and workplace genres
Capstone
  • rhetorical context: reflect on the nature of rhetorical context
  • collaboration: reflect on the nature of collaboration
  • writing processes: consider use of writing process in careers or other plans
  • argument: theorize about the nature of argument
  • analysis, synthesis, evaluation: theorize about the nature of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation
  • research: reflect on research strategies
  • style, conventions, language awareness: master editing and style; reflect on diversity of conventions
  • genres: reflect on the nature of genre
Resources menu; return to Sequenced Rubrics menu
Site maintained by comppile@gmail.com
Pages originally compiled and maintained by Keith Rhodes
Last updated February 14, 2010