Home | Statement | Drafts | History | Resources |
Preliminary
note: The following is a draft of a working document, posted here in order
to become an object of discussion, re-thinking, and revision. It is not
yet an official statement even by the Outcomes working group, and has not
been proposed yet for adoption by CCCC, NCTE, WPA, or any other official
professional organization. We strongly discourage any use or attribution
of the following language that does not take great care to represent it
accurately.
CCCC '98 WORKSHOP: OUTCOMES STATEMENT FOR FIRST-YEAR COMPOSITION [REVISED DRAFT]IntroductionWe seek to describe a set of common outcomes for first-year college composition classes. Recognizing that different institutions aim at different levels of achievement for their students, we have not attempted to define "standards," or precise levels of ability. Standards should be left for specific institutions or specific groups of institutions that might wish to set common standards. Instead, we seek to define the common knowledge, skills, and attitudes sought by the wide variety of approaches to first-year composition currently used in American post-secondary education. To some extent, then, we do seek to regularize those approaches, and to this end the document is not a mere compilation or summary of what is being taught. Rather, the following outcomes have been conscientiously grounded in practice, research, and theory all taken together.Thus, it is important that teachers and administrators do not imagine that these outcomes can be taught in reduced or simple ways. Rather, gaining these outcomes requires expert understanding of how students actually learn to write better. For this reason, while the drafters have aimed at being understood by a wide range of readers, the main audience for this document consists of well-prepared college writing teachers and college writing program administrators. Among such readers, terms such as "rhetorical," "genre," and "text" convey a rich and specific understanding that other readers may understand fully only after making further inquiry into research in the disciplines of composition and rhetoric. Further, it is important to see these statements as describing only what the drafters expect to find at the end of first-year composition, at most schools a required general education course or sequence of courses. As writers move beyond the first-year course, their writing abilities do not merely "increase." Rather, students' abilities both diversify along disciplinary lines and move into whole new levels where expected outcomes statements would expand, multiply, and diverge. Still, each statement of outcomes is followed by suggestions for further work that builds on these outcomes. These suggestions indicate not only that some institutions may aim to go beyond these outcomes even for first-year writers but also that writing education needs to continue throughout students' college careers. The suggestions also clarify why the drafters see these outcomes as important, indicating what further abilities can be developed upon such a base. Rhetorical KnowledgeBy the end of first year composition, students should
Critical Thinking, Reading, and WritingBy the end of first year composition, students should
ProcessesBy the end of first year composition, students should
Knowledge of Conventions.By the end of first year composition, students should
Return to Main menu | Return to the Outcomes History |
Site
maintained by comppile@gmail.com Pages originally compiled and maintained by Keith Rhodes Last updated February 14, 2010 |