<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CompPile: Share and Comment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comppile.org/comment/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comppile.org/comment</link>
	<description>CommentPress @ CompPile</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:00:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Session Comments / Questions</title>
		<link>http://comppile.org/comment/?p=14</link>
		<comments>http://comppile.org/comment/?p=14#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comppile.org/comment/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Credibility of online materials: how do we know it is reputable? How do we replicate "peer review" and the cachet it offers? And how do we represent at the site(s) that this is credible, making visible the process . . . . Some / many of us are not comfortable with the (seemingly ) less [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://comppile.org/comment/?feed=rss2&#038;p=14</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Download Handout</title>
		<link>http://comppile.org/comment/?p=13</link>
		<comments>http://comppile.org/comment/?p=13#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comppile.org/comment/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Download PDF file of handout: All statements]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://comppile.org/comment/?feed=rss2&#038;p=13</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WPA 2008 Roundtable: Steve Wilhoit</title>
		<link>http://comppile.org/comment/?p=12</link>
		<comments>http://comppile.org/comment/?p=12#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comppile.org/comment/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wilhoit WPA 2008 Roundtable: How can we better document, preserve, protect, and share our learning? Roundtable participants will introduce several available resources (including The Research Exchange, CompPile, CompFAQs, WAC Clearinghouse ), explore how and why these tools are currently underused, and invite the audience to explore ways to promote more effective uses of these tools [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://comppile.org/comment/?feed=rss2&#038;p=12</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WPA 2008 Roundtable: Glenn Blalock</title>
		<link>http://comppile.org/comment/?p=11</link>
		<comments>http://comppile.org/comment/?p=11#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 16:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comppile.org/comment/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roundtable: How can we better document, preserve, protect, and share our learning? We've built them, but who is coming, and what are they doing? Or why aren't they doing what we hoped? Glenn Blalock &#124; WPA 2008, July 2008 In the beginning (or post-"listserves are cool"): WAC Clearinghouse Kairos CompPile CompFAQs New and Recent Books [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://comppile.org/comment/?feed=rss2&#038;p=11</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WPA 2008 Roundtable: Mike Palmquist</title>
		<link>http://comppile.org/comment/?p=10</link>
		<comments>http://comppile.org/comment/?p=10#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 23:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comppile.org/comment/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How can we better document, preserve, protect, and share our learning? Mike Palmquist Colorado State University The short answer – or, more accurately, MY short answer – to this question is to modify our current approaches to scholarly publishing in a way that shifts the costs of production from publishers (both commercial and university presses) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://comppile.org/comment/?feed=rss2&#038;p=10</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WPA 2008 Roundtable: Rich Haswell</title>
		<link>http://comppile.org/comment/?p=9</link>
		<comments>http://comppile.org/comment/?p=9#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 23:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comppile.org/comment/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Debate over the Preservation and Accessibility of Scholarship in Composition Studies and Writing Program Administration Rich Haswell WPA Conference Denver, July, 2008 An overload of information, that is, anything much beyond what is truly needed, leads to information blackout. It does not enrich, but impoverishes. [Peter F. Drucker, Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices (1977)] If [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://comppile.org/comment/?feed=rss2&#038;p=9</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WPA 2008 Roundtable: Janis Haswell</title>
		<link>http://comppile.org/comment/?p=8</link>
		<comments>http://comppile.org/comment/?p=8#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 23:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comppile.org/comment/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opportunities of Open Access Scholarship: is the Field of Composition Ready?: Janis Haswell – Texas A&#38;M University-Corpus Christi Are literary studies and composition studies distinct in how they preserve and disseminate knowledge in the field? Think of what is “preserved” on the literature side: published texts, typescripts of drafts, letters from or to famous authors. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://comppile.org/comment/?feed=rss2&#038;p=8</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WPA 2008 Roundtable: Original Proposal</title>
		<link>http://comppile.org/comment/?p=6</link>
		<comments>http://comppile.org/comment/?p=6#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roundtable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wpa2008]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comppile.org/comment/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposal for a Panel, Roundtable, or Forum: The question in our title (from the conference CFP) poses problems that deserve innovative solutions. We propose a roundtable session that will depend on active audience participation to explore ways we can more effectively use currently available but underused technology tools to address this problem. At least until [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://comppile.org/comment/?feed=rss2&#038;p=6</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

